It Only Takes One To Win!
Why strategic patience is necessary as the Trump administration attempts to permanently drain the swamp.
By Jon Kurpis
There is widespread concern that the Epstein report has yet to be released, with many questioning the delays. The Attorney General’s mishandling of its release has only fueled further skepticism. Similarly, the lack of transparency surrounding the JFK files remains a pressing issue. These documents should have been made public decades ago. Despite these setbacks, it is crucial to maintain perspective.
For at least 75 years, a deeply entrenched bureaucratic system, often referred to as the “deep state” or “the swamp”, has operated with significant corruption and weaponization against those who challenge its authority. This shadow state has embedded itself within our government, making access to the truth nearly impossible.
These permanent bureaucrats are ruthless and will go to great lengths to obstruct justice at every level. Time after time, we have witnessed operatives withhold information, mislead the public, and even lie under oath. Above all, their greatest fear is Donald Trump and his second administration, as it threatens the very foundation upon which the globalist elite operate.
Even so, the American public’s demand for transparency is at an all time high and it extends far beyond the Epstein and JFK files. There is also a rightful expectation to see the full January 6th footage, the Seth Rich evidence, learn the truth behind alleged COVID bio labs, the identity of the J6 pipe bomber, and more.
Given the scope of just the Epstein list and the JFK assassination files, expecting their immediate release within such a short time frame under Trump’s renewed leadership is unrealistic. Any premature disclosure could result in severe legal ramifications and put lives at risk. From an objective standpoint, it is understandable why time is needed to ensure these releases are handled correctly.
Critics may point to Trump’s campaign promise of immediate releases. To that, I say: promises made on the campaign trail are not the same as navigating the realities of dismantling entrenched corruption. What matters is that the information emerges accurately and supports the pursuit of justice, even if it takes longer than anticipated. Patience is warranted if the outcome is meaningful.
The Role of Key Players
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel shoulder immense responsibilities. Both are still acclimating to their roles, which are pivotal to national security. Admittedly, Bondi’s handling of the Epstein release was a misstep, embarrassing, but not malicious. If we are serious about dismantling the deep state, we cannot impose unrealistic timelines rooted in campaign rhetoric. Instead, we must support their efforts to execute their duties effectively.
The key to draining the swamp lies in prosecuting a high-ranking figure capable of exposing the entire operation. This is why I point out that it only takes one to win.
Consider the possibility—widely speculated—that Kash Patel, in coordination with the DOJ, is building a case against former FBI Director James Comey. If substantiated, the ramifications would be historic. Unlike some, Former FBI Director Comey lacks a preemptive pardon or legal immunity for potential crimes. A conviction could carry severe penalties.
Let’s examine the potential charges:
Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information (18 U.S.C. § 798) – Comey allegedly leaked memos regarding private conversations with President Trump to the media. If proven, this carries a 10-year sentence per count.
FISA Abuse – The DOJ’s Inspector General found that FISA applications used to surveil the Trump campaign contained significant omissions. If Comey knowingly misled the court, he could face years in prison.
False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) – Lying to investigators or Congress carries a 5-year sentence per count.
Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, § 1512, etc.) – If Comey interfered with investigations, he could face 10 years per count.
Tampering with Evidence or Witnesses (§ 1512) – If Comey influenced witnesses or destroyed evidence, he could face up to 20 years in prison.
If James Comey is genuinely guilty and charges are stacked appropriately, he will be facing life in prison. I do not believe that Comey will spend the rest of his life in prison to protect his colleagues. If pressured, Comey will likely cut a deal for immunity in exchange for testifying against those above him.
Who was above Former FBI Director James Comey?
James Clapper (Former DNI)
John Brennan (Former CIA Director)
Joe Biden (Then Vice President)
Barack Obama (Former President)
James Clapper & John Brennan:
Allegations against James Clapper (former Director of National Intelligence) and John Brennan (former CIA Director) regarding their actions during the 2016 election and the Trump campaign stem primarily from their roles in the intelligence community’s handling of the Russia investigation (Crossfire Hurricane) and related activities, such as the Steele dossier and public statements about Trump. Below is an overview of what they’re alleged to have done wrong and the charges they could face if these claims prove to be true.
James Clapper (former Director of National Intelligence)
Perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) - In his 2013 testimony, Clapper knowingly lied about NSA surveillance. This normally carries a penalty of up to 5 years in prison. However, the statute of limitations (5 years) expired by 2018 so new evidence would be needed to make it stick. It should also be noted that if Clapper misled Congress about the 2016 Trump surveillance, fresh charges could be brought against him.
Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) - If James Clapper conspired with Brennan, Comey, or Obama to misuse intelligence resources against Trump’s campaign, he could get up to 5 years in prison. This would theoretically apply if Clapper approved the Steele Dossier knowing it was baseless.
Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information (18 U.S.C. § 798) - If Clapper leaked dossier details or any Russia probe info to CNN in 2017 as is widely suspected, he could face up to 10 years in prison.
FISA Violations (50 U.S.C. § 1809) - If Clapper authorized illegal surveillance, he could face up to 5 years per violation.
John Brennan (former CIA Director)
Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) - Similar to Clapper, if John Brennan orchestrated an intelligence campaign to sabotage Trump with fabricated evidence, he could face 5 years in prison.
Misuse of Intelligence Authority (50 U.S.C. § 3091) - If Brennan violated the CIA’s foreign-focus mandate by targeting Trump domestically, he could face charges tied to abuse of power. Penalties vary, but conspiracy or civil rights violations (18 U.S.C. § 242) could add up to 10 years in prison.
Unauthorized Disclosure (18 U.S.C. § 798) - If Brennan leaked classified info, like dossier contents or Russia probe details, before or after leaving office, he could face 10 years in prison.
Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503) - If Brennan pressured subordinates to withhold or alter any evidence during the Russia probe to harm Trump, obstruction of justice could apply which carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison.
Former President Barack Obama and then VP Joe Biden:
If Obama and Biden authorized the surveillance of Trump’s campaign in 2016, they could face serious legal consequences.
We know that on January 5, 2017, Obama, Biden, Comey, Susan Rice, and Sally Yates met at the White House to discuss these matters. This meeting raises critical questions and will be significant to ongoing investigations.
If evidence ends up showing that former President Obama and/or Joe Biden orchestrated an abuse of power or illegal surveillance, several laws may have been broken.
Abuse of Power and Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371) – If Obama and Biden conspired to misuse federal resources, like directing the FBI to fabricate or exaggerate the Crossfire Hurricane investigation to harm Trump’s campaign, they could face charges for conspiracy to defraud the United States. This statute covers agreements to interfere with lawful government functions, such as a free and fair election.
Violation of Civil Rights (18 U.S.C. § 242) - If Obama and Biden knowingly deprived Trump or his campaign of constitutional rights, this could theoretically apply.
Misuse of Classified Information or Intelligence (50 U.S.C. § 3121, FISA Violations) - If Obama and Biden manipulated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process by pushing for unjustified warrants on Carter Page to spy on the campaign, they certainly could face charges tied to intelligence abuses.
Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 or § 1512) - If Obama and Biden pressured former FBI Director James Comey to alter the Russia probe’s direction or leak damaging info (like the dossier briefing) to hinder Trump’s candidacy or presidency, obstruction charges would apply.
Joe Biden’s Role as Vice President
Joe Biden’s liability is very much dependent on his involvement. If he actively participated in planning or approving illegal acts, he could face similar charges as former President Obama. It’s important to remember that as VP, Biden lacked direct authority over the FBI, so his legal exposure would likely tie to conspiracy or acting as former President Obama’s agent.
Who Else Could Fall?
Susan Rice (Former National Security Advisor)
Andrew McCabe (Former FBI Deputy Director)
Rod Rosenstein (Former Deputy Attorney General)
And many others
Conclusion
If former FBI Director James Comey ends up facing life in prison and decides to cooperate, the institutionalized corruption that has plagued the US government for years can be dismantled. But the only way to stop this rot is by being strong enough to cut the head off of the snake.
To be clear: this is not political lawfare nor do I support such tactics. Unlike what the Democrats did to Donald Trump, this must be based on real evidence. If any of the above-mentioned individuals are innocent, they should not be punished. But if they did orchestrate corruption on such a profound scale, justice must be served regardless of their political status.
The bottom line is the US government has been corrupted in astonishing ways, but it can be fixed with bravery and the rule of law.
To give the Trump administration the best chance of success, we should temper criticism of Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel in the short-term. They are both new to their roles, and if they are indeed constructing a case against Comey, the nation’s future may quite literally hinge on their success.
Let’s not obsess over the immediate release of files like the Epstein List or JFK records.
Yes, they matter! Yes, they were promised! Yes, they must be released!
But we didn’t fight this battle merely to name perpetrators or to confirm that Oswald didn’t act alone.
We fought to reclaim our country. Patience is essential as this administration tackles the daunting challenges ahead.
Now some readers may find it difficult to believe that justice will finally be served on such a large scale. Corruption is deeply entrenched and omnipresent. Furthermore, President Trump underestimated the forces he was up against during his first term and was unable to rein in the deep state. If anything, its influence only grew stronger after his time in office.
To be candid, the likelihood of a complete victory remains slim given the significant legal and practical challenges ahead. Addressing systemic corruption requires far more than simply identifying a crime. That is the easy part. The real obstacles lie in finding new evidence, proving intent, navigating statutes of limitations, and working within the boundaries of presidential authority. Additionally, the deep state has spent decades constructing legal and bureaucratic safeguards to shield itself from accountability. Unless a key figure like James Comey cooperates, or new evidence emerges, the chances of fully dismantling this system remain low. Some aspects of corruption may be curtailed, but the complete eradication of the deep state is unlikely.
Despite these challenges and my own skepticism regarding the outcome, it is essential to remain optimistic. A positive mindset keeps the fight alive, and America deserves every opportunity to fix this issue in earnest. As history has shown, sometimes it doesn’t take much to bring about systemic change. In fact, sometimes it only takes one to win!